Posts Tagged ‘Evgeni Malkin’

Thoughts on last night’s Senators-Penguins game

December 24th, 2009

Pittsburgh Penguins- 8, Ottawa Senators- 2

Let’s not pull any punches – last night’s game was one of the worst performances from the Ottawa Senators in a long time. I know we said the same about a Sens loss to the Montreal Canadiens earlier this month, but this game was that bad. Last night’s game looked like men against boys and to make matters worse, the Senators lost captain Daniel Alfredsson with a suspected shoulder injury. TSN reported on Wednesday night that Alfredsson is expected to miss “a few weeks” with the injury.

Here are the Classy, Non-Classy, and Could-Have-Been-Classier moments of last night’s one-sided Senators-Penguins game.

The Classy

Nothing. I shouldn’t saying nothing. The first period featured some class. Especially the last 12 or so minutes. The Senators did all the things they needed to do in order to give themselves a chance against one of the NHL’s best teams. They cycled the puck well, they moved their feet, and they drove hard to the net. For most of the first period, Marc-Andre Fleury had to be very good, facing terrific screens and solid Senators net presence. And once the first period buzzer sounded, that was it for the night. (From a Senators-pressure perspective).

Non-Classy

The collapse the Senators displayed between the first and second period was something fierce. The most notable aspect of this collapse was the terrible defensive coverage. For those of you who didn’t catch the game, I can’t tell you how many 2 on 1′s were given up to the Penguins… maybe 8-10. To take this a step further, I’m going to outline which defenceman’s fault each goal was. It was that bad.

Goal 1: Filip Kuba wasn’t paying attention to the back door-cross ice pass to Evgeni Malkin. How was Malkin left wide open like that? It doesn’t make sense to play a tight box against such a star-studded powerplay like Pittsburgh’s.

Goal 2: Bill Guerrin walked out from the corner, took a shot and scored on his own rebound. He literally walked through or around Anton Volchenkov to do this. Why didn’t A-Train body check Guerrin, or at least get in his way?

Goal 3: First Erik Karlsson made a bad read on the 3 on 2, playing the puck and not the pass. He missed and the rush turned into a 2 on 1. Then Kuba does the exact same thing. He didn’t take away the pass like they teach in minor hockey, goes for the shooter and suddenly Ruslan Fedotenko was left with the puck and an open net.

Goal 4: Matt Carkner and Jonathan Cheechoo combined for the world’s worst breakout, ever. The result was a clean turnover (which looked more like a pass) to Guerrin who made a great tip-pass to Chris Kunitz, who’s left wide open as Alexandre Picard was nowhere to be found in the slot. Generally, when your defensive partner is behind the net making a breakout pass, the other defenceman stands in front of their net guarding the slot. Clearly this didn’t happen.

Goal 5: This was a 3 on 1 goal that made Carkner look ridiculous. Ottawa took a chance going for a shorthanded 3 on 2 rush and got burned. I don’t mind the risk – at this point it was 4-1 for the Penguins – but having Mike Fisher on that rush with Kuba and Jarrko Ruutu isn’t the most dangerous looking rush from a Penguins perspective. I wouldn’t take it seriously either.

Goal 6: Chris Phillips chased a Penguin all the way up to the blue line and Chris Neil dropped back for support. So far so good. Then, knowing he’s covering for a defenceman, Chris Neil delivered a soft pass right up the middle of the high slot (another no-no lesson from minor hockey) right on Kunitz’ stick, setting up for a 2 on 1 for Kunitz and Malkin. Of course, Picard being the lone defenceman doesn’t take away the pass hanging Leclaire out to dry.

Goal 7: Sergei Gonchar snuck into the slot and scored on a one timer, right in front of Kuba. No slot coverage at all. Nice.

Goal 8:  Ryan Shannon is the lone Senator playing defence in the offensive zone. Chris Phillips saw this from the half-boards, sends a bad pass to Shannon (that he had to receive on his backhand), setting up for 2 on 0 with Malkin and Sidney Crosby. Result: Malkin hat-trick.

Yes, Pascal Leclaire didn’t look good in his Senators return, but he wasn’t given any help whatsoever. I find it hard to blame Leclaire when the defence played this poorly.

Could-Have-Been-Classier

One area (of many) the Ottawa Senators could have been classier in was discipline. For a team who publicly complained about the lack of powerplays they’d been receiving, they didn’t help themselves last night. The Pittsburgh Penguins scored on 3 of their 8 powerplays… and they have the league’s worst powerplay. I found a lot of the penalties taken were unnecessary – Jonathan Cheechoo’s back-to-back penalties come to mind, especially given the timing of the penalties. The Senators were tied at 1 at that point. Basically, this was a pretty big fail by the Sens. “Penalty-Fail”.

- -

Luckily for Alfredsson and the Senators, they’ll have a few days off between games. In fact, their next game is on Saturday night in Buffalo against Ryan Miller and the Sabres. I don’t even know what else to say. Hopefully for Senators fans, there’s a much better effort from the club.

Stay classy, Ottawa Senators.

Follow Burgundy on Twitter or be a Stayclassy.net fan on Facebook.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

The Martin Brodeur debate – which side are you on?

December 22nd, 2009

With last night’s 4-0 victory over the Pittsburgh Penguins, Martin Brodeur became the all time shutout leader in the NHL. This is Brodeur’s 104th career shutout, one more than goaltending great Terry Sawchuk. It goes without saying that this accomplishment is one for the ages and probably won’t be broken for some time to come. And as a side note, how does Brodeur shut out the likes of Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, and others for this record yet was unable to do so against Florida, Carolina, or Philadelphia earlier this month?

Congratulations Martin Brodeur! A classy accomplishment.

Martin Brodeur now holds the all time NHL shutout record after a 4-0 win last night

Martin Brodeur now holds the all time NHL shutout record after a 4-0 win last night

No one debates that Brodeur is a great goaltender — except for a few goalie friends of mine (but whatever, goalies are like drummers and are particular and weird…) —  the man is a Stanley Cup champion, Olympic champion, and has won many other accolades.

But it begs the question: Is Martin Brodeur the best goalie of all time or is he a great goalie who’s always had a very solid team (with a defensive system) in front of him?

Personally, I believe Brodeur is the best of all time. He’s had the luxury of playing in a strong system with a good team, but he was the backbone of that very system. Brodeur’s NHL career has seem him play more than 1000 games with a career goals against average of 2.21 and a save percentage of .914. He’s played 70+ games in a season 11 times – each time posting 38 wins or more. He’s helped redefine how goalies can handle the puck and its value to breakouts/dump ins. He’s won four Vezina trophies and turned in clutch performances time and time again.

I don’t know how much more of a case I can plead. Either way, I’m sure you have your thoughts. There are probably hundreds of other articles online that discuss this topic in further detail, but I don’t care. I want to hear from our Classy community and see what you think and why.

Is Brodeur the best goalie ever? Why or why not?

Stay classy, Martin Brodeur.

Follow us on Twitter or become a fan of Stayclassy.net on Facebook.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Oh, NHL, just give in and say yes to the 2014 Russian Olympics

September 23rd, 2009

Oh Gary Bettman, Bill Daly and the NHL, just give in. Say yes to NHL players participating in the 2014 Russian Olympic games.

Sure, it’s 5 years away and we should probably stick to speculating the inevitable 2010 Gold medal showdown between Canada and Russia (ie. Crosby versus Ovechkin), but you know the NHL will eventually cave on the Russian games.

Stay classy, Alex Ovechkin and Evgeni Malkin

Stay classy, Alex Ovechkin, and Evgeni Malkin

How couldn’t they?

I bet One Ca-Jillion-Buzzillion Dollars NHL players end up playing for their respective countries at the 2014 Olympics. When two of the NHL’s brightest stars – Alex Ovechkin and Evgeni Malkin – basically say they are willing to risk their NHL careers to play in this tournament, the proverbial NHL hand is forced.

There is no way the NHL will go against Ovechkin on this. No offense Evgeni, but Ovechkin probably has enough pull on his own.

If fans didn’t despise Bettman enough for pulling franchises out of Canada for elusive Southern US markets, they certainly will should Bettman push against Ovechkin and his desire to represent Russia on hockey’s biggest stage.

To make matters worse, the relationship between the NHL and the Russia is fragile (Transfer agreements, KHL contracts, etc…). I can’t see this relationship improving, should the NHL not allow players to play in the Russian Olympics.

I realize this is an issue that drastically affects NHL teams and is something the Owners have a large say in. After all, they do pay the contracts of stars like Ovechkin, Malkin and any other NHLer thinking about playing in the Olympics.

But check out these quotes:

“Nobody can tell me you can’t play for your country. I don’t care, it’s my decision and I want to represent my country at the Olympic Games.”
- Alex Ovechkin, Washington Capitals forward

“I would rather pay fines and still go. If there is something serious like a disqualification for a couple of years in the NHL, if there is something like this I will probably still go because I can even leave to Russia to play.”
- Evgeni Malkin, Pittsburgh Penguins forward

Think they are kidding? I can’t see the NHL going against the wishes of star players like Ovechkin and Malkin. And they aren’t the only players either. They are the most outspoken about it at this point. Expect more players to join them in pushing the NHL into this as we get closer to the 2014 games.

Try to worm your way out of this one, Gary Bettman. We all know you’ll cave eventually.

Stay classy, Ovechkin and Malkin.

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Debunking the Top-50

September 22nd, 2009

Mike Brophy over at Sportsnet just released his Top-50 players for the upcoming season. #1, 2, and 3 belong to Sidney Crosby, Alex Ovechkin and Evgeni Malkin, respectively. But it is his points about one former Ottawa Senator and two current Senators that beg some questions.

16. Dany Heatley- His popularity took a massive hit after he insisted the Ottawa Senators trade him, but Heatley remains one of the NHL’s most potent goal scorers and he should return to form skating on a line with Joe Thornton in San Jose. Heatley should be in contention for the Rocket Richard Trophy.

While I don’t disagree that Dany Heatley is a natural goal scorer, I continue to question whether he can handle the aggressive, physical play of the Pacific Division. We all saw how he folded against Anaheim in the Finals, and I doubt he can hold up to that kind of grinding play.

The expectation that he will be in contention for the Rocket Richard Trophy also makes me wonder. Has Heatley ever really been in contention for that? I know he’s consistently been amongst the league’s highest goal scorers, but his numbers have dropped off, even before last season. I bet Ilya Kovalchuk still takes that award.

23. Daniel Alfredsson- With the foundation of the team crumbling around him, Alfredsson remains the voice of reason in Ottawa and a damn fine two-way star as well.

Why do the Toronto media continue to suggest that the foundation of this team is crumbling. They lost one player who didn’t want to be there anymore. If that was our foundation, then we had a problem. At least Brophy acknowledges that Alfredsson continues to remain a voice of reason and a star, but why did he have to preface that statement with such dire circumstances. Alfredsson’s only downfall will be his age, not the team around him.

43. Jason Spezza- Despite playing six more games last season than he did the year before, Spezza finished with 19 fewer points and now he won’t have sharp-shooter Dany Heatley skating on his line. One can only hope Jonathan Cheechoo rediscovers his scoring touch.

At least Spezza made this list. I was getting worried as I scrolled down. But to suggest that Spezza’s numbers will fall off without Heatley not truly examining the additions to Ottawa. Not only does he still have Alfredsson (the two actually combined for more points than Heatley and Spezza ever did), but Michalek, Kovalev and Cheechoo can all bury the puck. Brophy’s analysis here doesn’t given enough credit to a much deeper forward line-up in Ottawa.

I give Brophy credit here for sticking his neck out there and he also acknowledges that he wants comments and discussion on his picks. But I’m getting a little tired of the suggestion that the loss of Heatley will be enough cause for a grieving period. If Ottawa falters out of the gate, the soapboxes in Toronto will be covered in analysts screaming that Bryan Murray lost that trade and that the foundation of this team is crumbling. Meanwhile, in reality (or outside of Toronto), this foundation looks more solid than ever.

Hindsight is always 20/20, so I’m sure #23 and #43 will be up a little higher on that list when the season is over.

Stay classy, Mike Brophy’s pre-season Top-50. Make room for the Senators.

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

NHL clubs trending well, a royal bolt of chief decision making

July 13th, 2009

This is the time in the year when every NHL organization is gearing up to start the regular season.  All you hear, see and read is the end goal.  “We want to win the Stanley Cup”.  (Really glad to hear that.)  For some teams, it’s a foregone conclusion they won’t be playing hockey next May.  And for other clubs, it’s a legitimate statement fans believe.

The impact a summer of rebuilding, retooling or simply tweaking has never been as critical to an upcoming season’s success.  Judging by today’s rosters and the moves we’ve seen (or in some cases, not seen), I believe some teams are stronger, while others are weaker and it starts with key decision making from GMs and front offices.  Today, let’s talk about team’s who’ve drastically improved their rosters since ending the season last year.

Los Angeles Kings
I like the Kings and the patience they’ve showed assembling their young core group.  I like that they went out and got Ryan Smyth last week.  The price was high and giving up a Powerplay quarterback like Kyle Quincey is tough, but with their defensive depth and the need for gritty/skilled/experienced forwards, the deal makes sense.  Smyth is a good player on a solid team.  I don’t think he’s a first line guy, but think he’s very effective within a team of stars.  The young Kings kids will learn from him and I feel Smyth will be rejuvinated with the Kings after playing the last few years with the Colorado Avalanche and New York Islanders.  The Kings remind me a bit of last season’s Blackhawks, but aren’t quite as solid, yet.  Although I believe Los Angeles will make the playoffs this year, I don’t think they’ll see the Conference Finals in the 09-10 season.

Tampa Bay Lightning
Talk about two summers of difference for the Lightning.  Last summer looked like random UFA spending without a plan.  This summer they plugged roster holes in a seemingly calculated way.  After selecting Victor Hedman 2nd overall at this summer’s NHL Entry Draft,  Tampa Bay signed Mattias Ohlund to a 7 year deal.  Nice – the Lightning get an experienced NHL defenceman at a good price and someone who happens to speak the native Ikea tongue of Hedman.  Also, signing Kurtis Foster is a great depth signing.  Having 3 stronger defenceman will help Andrej Meszaros feel more comfortable, especially on the powerplay where they need him most.  I strongly believe Hedman to be a better fit in Tampa than Tavares would have been.  The Lightning needed quality defenceman more than offense (Vinny Lecavalier, Steven Stampkos and Marty St. Louis) and got it.  Especially when you consider the firepower of other Eastern Conference stars like Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, Jason Spezza, Alex Ovechkin and others.  Good job, Tampa.  Within the next three years, I see a deep playoff run for the Lightning.

Chicago Blackhawks
Despite scaring the living crap out of revived Blackhawks fans, everything is calm in the Windy City.  Getting both Cam Barker and Kris Versteeg under contract for the next three years was a good move and secures depth for the Hawks.  Adding a player at the caliber of Marian Hossa isn’t a bad thing, for the immediate future.  Unlike the Lightning and Kings, the Hawks are on my list for the moves they didn’t make – signing any other players they probably didn’t need.  The reality is they need all the cap room they can get for impending contract renewals for Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane, Andrew Ladd, Duncan Keith and more.  I believe this is the year Chicago finally dethrones the Detroit Red Wings from the Central Division dominance… assuming new GM Stan Bowman doesn’t screw up next year’s RFA contracts.

(** All major hockey outlets are reporting this morning the Hawks have shuffled their front office and have replaced GM Dale Tallon with Scottie Bowman’s son, Stan Bowman.  Tallon is now the Senior advisor of hockey operations for the Blackhawks. **)

Stay classy, Kings, Lightning and Hawks.

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

2009 NHL award predictions

June 18th, 2009

You can tell a hockey fan is starved for hockey news when try actually blog about being excited for an annual awards show.  I’m not a big fan of any awards shows, but in this case, the NHL’s Las Vegas awards show might give me a 2 hour hockey fix.

Between the awards show, the latest on Jim Balsillie and Bryan Burke ripping Dany Heatley, I’m hoping its enough to tide us hockey fans before next weekend’s NHL Entry Draft in Montreal.  If not, we could always bring back Handshake-gate.

So anyways, with the NHL awards hours away and since we need to make up for some less-than-stellar Stanley Cup playoff picks, here’s my shot at predicting the award winners, without any noise (logic, reasoning, etc…).

What do your picks look  like?
 

Hart Memorial Trophy (most valuable player, voted by media)
Winner: Alex Ovechkin – Washington Capitals
Runners up: Pavel Datsyuk – Detroit Red Wings,  Evgeni Malkin – Pittsburgh Penguins

Vezina Trophy (goaltender of the year)
Winner: Tim Thomas – Boston Bruins
Runners up: Steve Mason – Columbus Blue Jackets, Niklas Backstrom – Minnesota Wild

Norris Trophy (defenseman of the year)
Winner:  Zdeno Chara – Boston Bruins
Runners up: Nicklas Lidstrom – Detroit Red Wings, Mike Green – Washington Captials

Calder Trophy (rookie of the year)
Winner: Steve Mason – Columbus Blue Jackets
Runners up: Bobby Ryan – Anaheim Ducks, Kris Versteeg – Chicago Blackhawks

Selke Trophy (best defensive forward)
Winner: Pavel Datsyuk – Detroit Red Wings
Runners up: Ryan Kessler – Vancouver Canucks, Mike Richards – Philadelphia Flyers

Jack Adams Trophy (coach of the year)
Winner: Todd Mclellan – San Jose Sharks
Runners up: Claude Julien – Boston Bruins, Andy Murray – St. Louis Blues 

Lady Byng Trophy (most sportsman player at an elite level)
Winner: Pavel Datsyuk – Detroit Red Wings
Runners up: Marty St. Louis – Tampa Bay Lightning, Zach Parise – New Jersey Devils

Lester B. Pearson Trophy (MVP, voted by players)
Winner: Alex Ovechkin – Washington Capitals
Runners up: Pavel Datsyuk – Detroit Red Wings,  Evgeni Malkin – Pittsburgh Penguins 

Bill Masterson Trophy (perseverance, sportsmanship and dedication to hockey)
Winner: Richard Zednik – Florida Panthers
Runners up: Steve Sullivan – Nashville Predators, Chris Chelios – Detroit Red Wings 

 

The most intriguing award of the night will be the Rookie of the Year; Bobby Ryan vs Steve Mason… though call.  Ultimately, Mason bailed out the Blue Jackets and got them into the playoffs.

 

Stay classy, NHL award ceremonies held in Las Vegas

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals – The final game this season

June 12th, 2009

Tonight the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Detroit Red Wings square off for the Stanley Cup.  The regular season is irrelevant and the future doesn’t matter.  It’s about making less mistakes than the opponent for the last 60 minutes of the 2008-2009 season.  That actually sounds pretty easy.  Pretty sure every professional hockey player would shake their heads if they thought I was serious.  Well, I am, sorta, but you know how these things are…

Who has the advantage going into game 7 tonight?  It depends who you ask, but I’d like to objectively point out two area’s I think Pittsburgh benefits from.  

Game 7 Experience
So much has been said about the Detroit Red Wings and their Stanley Cup experience from their recent Cup victories, however, most players on the Wings have never done so in a game 7.  So how is that an advantage for Pittsburgh?  Simple – the Penguins just don’t know any better.  This game is exactly like game 6: lose the game and you lose the Cup.  The simple fact the Wings haven’t been in game 7 territory might be enough to get them overthinking the situation.  Yes – these are pro’s of the highest level, but they are still human beings.  Every situation Detroit has faced in recent years, they’ve faced before.  Nothing is new for them… until now.  Pittsburgh’s youth could certainly provide an odd advantage here.

Improvements & Answers
Despite losing Ryan Malone in the off-season (note: next time you want to sign Malone; sign his dad first), Marian Hossa to some other team (can’t remember who…) and trading Ryan Whitney (maybe the Pens just don’t like Ryans, hence why they drafted Sidney Crosby over Anaheim Duck pick Bobby Ryan… alright.  Bad joke…), the Penguins are a deeper team than last year.  Every game they play (with exceptions to game 5…), shows they’ve learned from previous experiences.  They didn’t get shutout in games 1 or 2 at the Joe Louis Arena, like last year and they won game 6 in Pittsburgh, unlike last year.  They didn’t panick against Washington and completely dominated game 7 of that series.  The remarkable thing about the Penguins playoff run this year is that they seem to have an answer for everything.  When they look down and out, they play better.  They turn up the heat.  When Evgeni Malkin’s play is questioned, he gets better.  Marc-Andre Fleury was pulled in game 5, yet rebounds in game 6 for a huge performance.  You get my drift.  The Penguins Cup run hasn’t been a fairy tale, but when the clutch performances are needed most, the Penguins have come through every time.

 

I’m still thinking Crosby’s raising Lord Stanley tonight.  For the sake of this blog (We did say we might turn Stayclassy.net into a fishing blog if we’re not right on the Penguins winning…), I hope I’m right.  

*Gulp*
 

Stay classy, young Penguins

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.


VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

The what-ifs of the Stanley Cup Finals – Game 7 especially…

June 11th, 2009

 

This has been an incredible series to watch. Great hockey from both the Detroit Red Wings and the Pittsburgh Penguins. Ups, downs, and lots of what-ifs. Really, this series has boiled down to the intangibles. Leading into Game 7, a lot of these questions are going to be talked about. And this series will undoubtedly come down to a few more. But I present to you, the best what-if moments of the Stanley Cup Finals.
 
What if:
 
- Malkin had scored on that breakway in Game 1, when the score was still notched at 2-1?
- Abdelkader wasn’t slotted into the lineup, and scored two clutch goals to put it out of reach?
- Abdelkader hadn’t been scratched for Games 3, 4, 5 and 6?
- Hossa hadn’t been silent for most of the series?
- Fleury hadn’t stopped Cleary on that breakaway?
- The Wings hadn’t embarassed the Penguins in Game 5?
- Scuderi hadn’t made 3 impressive saves at the end of Game 6?
- Staal and Kennedy hadn’t stepped up and provided that secondary scoring?
 
So, leading into Game 7 on Friday night, here’s a few more, which could essentially win the Stanley Cup.
 
What if:
 
- Crosby steps up and breaks the jinx at the Joe?
- Malkin provides another dominating performance to finish these playoffs?
- Zetterberg and Datsyuk put on a ‘defense turning into offense’ clinic?
- Hossa breaks out of his funk?
- Fleury makes another game-changing save early in Game 7 (see game-changing save in Game 7 against the Capitals)?
 
All of these factors, and many more, are huge for tomorrow’s game. I refuse to make a call or prediction in this forum. I’ve done it in the past, but it never works out. Just know that we are lucky enough to have a Game 7, and to keep an eye out for these intangibles. Man I love sports.

This has been an incredible series to watch. Great hockey from both the Detroit Red Wings and the Pittsburgh Penguins. Ups, downs, and lots of what-ifs. Really, this series has boiled down to the intangibles. Leading into Game 7, a lot of these questions are going to be talked about. And this series will undoubtedly come down to a few more. But I present to you, the best what-if moments of the Stanley Cup Finals.

 What if:

- Malkin had scored on that breakway in Game 1, when the score was still notched at 2-1?

- Abdelkader wasn’t slotted into the lineup, and scored two clutch goals to put it out of reach?

- Abdelkader hadn’t been scratched for Games 3, 4, 5 and 6?

- Hossa hadn’t been silent for most of the series?

- Fleury hadn’t stopped Cleary on that breakaway?

- The Wings hadn’t embarassed the Penguins in Game 5?

- Scuderi hadn’t made 3 impressive saves at the end of Game 6?

- Staal and Kennedy hadn’t stepped up and provided that secondary scoring?

 

So, leading into Game 7 on Friday night, here’s a few more, which could essentially win the Stanley Cup.

What if:

- Crosby steps up and breaks the jinx at the Joe?

- Malkin provides another dominating performance to finish these playoffs?

- Zetterberg and Datsyuk put on a ‘defense turning into offense’ clinic?

- Hossa breaks out of his funk?

- Fleury makes another game-changing save early in Game 7 (see game-changing save in Game 7 against the Capitals)?

 

All of these factors, and many more, are huge for tomorrow’s game. I refuse to make a call or prediction in this forum. I’ve done it in the past, but it never works out. Just know that we are lucky enough to have a Game 7, and to keep an eye out for these intangibles. Man I love sports.

 

Stay classy, NHL fans

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Who's your Conn Smythe pick?

June 8th, 2009

Not since 2003 has a player on the losing team in the Stanley Cup finals won the Conn Smythe trophy as the most valuable player.  We all remember J.S. Giguere’s performance that year, and that thick beard that probably had Scott Niedermayer jealous in both length and color (grey beards don’t look cool, Scott). 

And as the 2009 Stanley Cup playoffs wind down either Tuesday or Friday night, we’ll be left figuring out this year’s Conn Smythe winner.  Well, we won’t, the NHL will, but you get what I mean.  It’s with no surprise that this year’s Conn Smythe winner is a 2 horse race between Evgeni Malkin and Henrik Zetterberg.  

You can make pretty good arguments for Sidney Crosby, Chris Osgood and maybe even Johan Franzen, but ultimately, Zetterberg and Malkin are the front runners.  Their impact – although slightly different – are the big reason why both Detroit and Pittsburgh are in the finals, again.  

The winner of the Conn Smythe usually goes to the winning team.  Duh.  Unless a performance nearly overshaddows the winning team, like Giguere in 2003.  So the question really becomes:

If the Red Wings win the Stanley Cup, has Evgeni Malkin done enough to win the Conn Smythe?  

Conversely, if the Penguins win the Stanely Cup, has Henrik Zetterberg done enough?

Malkin has truly stepped up, leading the Penguins (and all other players) with 35 points in 22 games.  Zetterberg is 3rd in playoff scoring (24 points in 21 games), but his biggest contributions lie in his defensive play, shutting down Rick Nash, Ryan Getzlaf, Patrick Kane and now Sidney Crosby.  Oh yeah, and his offensive contributions aren’t anything to frown on either.

It’s a tough call.  Ultimately,  the team that wins the Stanley Cup will probably host the Conn Smythe as that player will likely outplay everyone else, propelling their team to victory.  But that’s based on how the NHL has typically awarded the trophy.

Who do I think should win the trophy, regardless of who wins the Cup?  Henrik Zetterberg, by a mile.  He’s shut down some of the game’s best and brightest stars as noted above.  He’s been relied on even more in the Stanley Cup finals with Pavel Datsyuk injured and out of action.  He’s average more than a point per game in the playoffs (averaged slightly less in the regular season), despite increased attention and time spent in the defensive zone. 

Hank should win this trophy.  I believe he’s meant more to the Detroit Red Wings than Evgeni Malkin has to the Pittsburgh Penguins.  Don’t get me wrong – Malkin is no slouch.  I believe Zetterberg has been a hair or two more dominant to the Red Wing’s pursuit of Lord Stanley than Malkin to the Penguins.  Do you agree?

Stay classy, Zetterberg

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Pittsburgh Penguins unsung hero's

June 5th, 2009

Who would of thought one year would make this kind of difference?  As the Stanley Cup finals continue to move forward,the Pittsburgh Penguins continue to improve and there’s no better evidence of this than Evgeni Malkin.

The billing for this year’s Detroit Red Wings/Pittsburgh Penguins match up was a more confident and experience Penguins team against the truely professional Red Wings.  We’re seeing just that.  Game 4′s second period explosion from the Penguins could very well be a turning point in the series.

So while Malkin, Marc-Andre Fleury and Sidney Crosby (oh yeah, that guy – we’ve nearly forgotten about him with Geno’s play) are the hero’s, there’s a number of other unhearlded Penguins who deserve kudos: specifically  Maxime Talbot and Ruslan Fedotenko.

Ruslan Fedotenko has 13 playoff points in Pittsburgh’s 21 playoff games (7 goals, 6 assists) – not too shabby.  Averaging a goal every second game certainly forces defenders to take note of him, as well as Malkin.  Defenseman have to cheat somewhere and Fedotenko has really stepped up his playoff game.

Maxime Talbot has 10 points in Pittsburgh’s 21 playoff games (6 goals, 4 assists) – again, not too shabby.  Although only one of Talbot’s goals is a game winning goal, it’s worth noting the timing of each to be impecable.  Talbot’s timely slapshot that beat Cam Ward in the Conference Finals, right after a penalty kill was certainly a boost and a turning point in the series.  Talbot’s fight with Flyer’s tough guy Dan Carcillo was the spark the Penguins needed to get through the second round and his forechecking has opened up space for Malkin and Fedotenko to work their magic. 

Secondary scoring is an absolute must for deep playoffs runs – a good reason why Pittsburgh are two wins away from the Stanley Cup.  Talbot is a +6 and Fedotenko is a +8.  Talk about a gritty scoring line who’s getting things done for Pittsburgh, while Crosby continues to the head-to-head match up with Henrik Zetterberg.

Stay classy, Max and Ruslan

Add SC.net on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

VN:F [1.9.4_1102]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)